| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2004] All ER (D) 147 (Apr) |
| Court: | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Judge Peter Clark |
| Representation | David Bean QC (instructed by BBH, Wirral) for the employee. |
| Brain Langstaff QC and Damian Brown (instructed by Rayleys, Barnsley) for the employer. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 4 September 2003 |
Catchwords
Employment - Employment Tribunal - Procedure - Directions order - Appeal.
The Case
Appeals against interlocutory orders made by the employment tribunal were no different from appeals against substantive decisions and the jurisdiction of the Employment Appeal Tribunal was limited to correcting errors of law by the tribunal below. In the instant case, where there had been no error of law in the directions order made by the tribunal, the appeal tribunal had no jurisdiction to arrive at some different procedural order.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
