| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2003] All ER (D) 71 (Nov) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2003] EWCA Crim 3110 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Waller LJ, Hughes J and Dame Heather Steele |
| Representation | Jonathan Rose (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant. |
| David Groome (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 6 November 2003 |
Catchwords
Sentencing - Confiscation order - Proceeds of crime - Qualifying offence - Benefit - Defendant convicted of trade mark offences alleging possession of items with a view to gain - Benefit to defendant - s 71(4) - ss 92(1)(c), 92(3)(b).
The Case
The offences under ss92(1)(c) and 92(3)(b) of the which applied where a defendant possessed certain items with a view to a gain, were qualifying offences from which the defendant had benefited within the meaning of s71(4) of the . Accordingly, the Crown Court had jurisdiction to make a confiscation order in respect of those offences.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
