| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2003] All ER (D) 358 (Mar) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Lloyd J |
| Representation | Roger Bartlett (instructed by Kingsfords, Ashford) for the claimant. |
| Michael Waterworth (instructed by Thomson Snell & Passmore, Turnbridge Wells) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 24 March 2003 |
Catchwords
Injunctions - Freezing order - Application to continue injunction - Consideration of relevant facts.
The Case
On the claimant's application for the continuation of a freezing order against the first defendant restraining him from dealing with certain property, the court decided that since the proceeds of the mortgage advances had been dispersed, it would grant an injunction on a continuing basis, limited to restraining the first defendant from disposing of, or in any way dealing with the property.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
