| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2003] All ER (D) 385 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2003] EWCA Civ 391 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Schiemann, Jonathan Parker and Keene LJJ |
| Representation | The company appeared by its representative. |
| Andrew Sutcliffe QC and Andrew McGee (instructed by DLA) for the bank. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 26 March 2003 |
Catchwords
Companies - Register of Companies - Restoration of company to Register after dissolution - Direction that no period of limitation should run in respect of any claim of company not statute-barred on date of dissolution between date of dissolution and date of order - Entitlement of third party to oppose limitation direction - s 635(3).
The Case
A third party who would be prejudiced by a limitation direction sought by the company being restored to the Register of Companies was entitled to be heard in opposition to it.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
