| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2003] All ER (D) 189 (Jun) |
| Court: | Divisional Court |
| Judge: | Auld LJ and Goldring J |
| Representation | Edward Coke (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the prosecution. |
| The respondents did not appear and were not represented. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 16 June 2003 |
Catchwords
Criminal law - Football offences - Designated football matches - Chant of a racialist nature - Effect of use of word 'Paki' - s 3(2)(b).
The Case
The modern common understanding of the word 'Paki' was that it was a slang expression which was racially offensive. Indeed, it was a word, which was often used as a prelude to violence whether provoking or offering it. Although it was necessary to look at it in its context on a case by case basis, on the facts found in the instant case, it was plain that the chanting in which the second respondent was alleged to have taken part, namely shouting 'you're a town of Pakis' at opposition supporters at a designated football match, was 'of a racialist nature' as defined by s3(2)((b) of the . It followed that the matter would be remitted to the district judge with a direction to convict.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

