| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2003] UKHL 40 |
| Court: | House of Lords |
| Judge: | Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough, Lord Scott of Foscote and Lord Rodger of Earlsferry |
| Representation | The claimant did not appear and was not represented. |
| The defendant did not appear and were not represented. | |
| Lord Goldsmith QC and Jonathan Crow (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State. | |
| Monica Carss-Fisk QC (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) as amicus curiae. | |
| Jonathan Sumption QC and Mark Hoskins (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Speaker of the House of Commons, an intervenor. | |
| Richard Gordon QC and Jonathan Hough (instructed by Sharpe Pritchard) for CGNU plc, Royal & Sun Alliance plc, Axa Insurance UK plc and Churchill Insurance Co Ltd, as intervenors. | |
| William Hibbert and Robert Weir (instructed by Gregory Rowcliffe & Milners) for the Financing & Leasing Association, as intervenor. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 10 July 2003 |
Catchwords
Consumer credit - Credit agreement - Compliance with statutory requirements - Enforceability - Agreement prior to coming into force of Human Rights Act - Court of Appeal making declaration of incompatibility - Applicability of Human Rights Act - s 127(3) - s 3.
The Case
Whether s3 applied to pre-Act events depended on the principle that Parliament was presumed not to have intended to alter the law applicable to past events and transactions in a manner which would be unfair to those concerned in them, unless a contrary intention appeared. As in general s3(1) did not apply to causes of action accruing before the section came into force, Parliament could not have intended that application of s3(1) should have the effect of altering parties' existing rights and obligations under the .
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

