| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2003] All ER (D) 145 (Oct) |
| Court: | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Judge Levy QC, Mr B Beynon and Mr A Manners |
| Representation | Michael Curtis (instructed by C Drage, Devizes) for the employee. |
| Daniel Stilitz (instructed by Nabarro Nathanson) for the local authority. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 8 July 2003 |
Catchwords
Employment - Unfair dismissal - Complaint to employment tribunal - Decision of tribunal that employee unfairly dismissed - Correctness of decision.
The Case
In reaching its conclusion that the employee had been unfairly dismissed, the employment tribunal had made a finding which had not been argued before it, and it was possible that that finding affected its conclusion that the authority had acted unreasonably. Accordingly, the matter would be remitted to the tribunal to be re-argued.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
