| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2003] All ER (D) 255 (Jan) |
| Court: | European Court of Human Rights |
| Judge: | Judges Pellonpaa (President), Bratza, Pastor Ridruejo, Fischback, Maruste, Pavlovschi and Garlicki, and Mr M O'Boyle (Section Registrar) |
| Judgment Dates: | 28 January 2003 |
Catchwords
Human rights - Right to private and family life - CCTV - Disclosure of images of applicant from CCTV - Publication of images without masking of applicant's identity - Lack of effective domestic remedy - Just satisfaction for non-pecuniary loss - European Convention on Human Rights, arts 8, 13 and 41.
The Case
The applicant whose image had been captured on CCTV had had his right to private life violated since the authority whose CCTV it was had disclosed the material leading to it being broadcast without the applicant's identity being masked. Further he had no effective domestic remedy.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
