| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2003] All ER (D) 156 (Jul) |
| Court: | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Recorder Bowers QC, Mrs C Baelz and Mr P Dawson |
| Judgment Dates: | 31 January 2003 |
Catchwords
Practice and procedure - Striking out - Originating application - Correct approach - Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2001 () Sch 1, r 15.
The Case
When considering r15 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2001 () the employment tribunal had to adopt a two-stage approach; firstly, to decide whether the application was misconceived and secondly, if the answer to that question was yes, to decide whether as a matter of discretion to order the application be struck out, amended or, if there was an application for one, that a pre-hearing deposit be given.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
