| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2003] All ER (D) 116 (Mar) |
| Court: | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Judge Peter Clark, Dr D Grieves and Mr H Singh |
| Representation | The employee appeared in person. |
| Anthony Ross (instructed by Alison Lowton) for the employer. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 5 February 2003 |
Catchwords
Discrimination - Disability discrimination - Employment - Employment tribunal finding employee not a disabled person - Conflicting medical evidence - Correctness of decision - s 1.
The Case
In the instant case, an employment tribunal had been faced with a straight conflict of medical evidence between the two doctors, and had been entitled to prefer the opinion of the second doctor and to reach a conclusion that the employee was not a disabled person for the purposes of s1 of the .
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
