| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2003] All ER (D) 125 (Aug) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Pumfrey J |
| Representation | Nicholas Stewart QC (instructed by Bullivant Jones & Co, Liverpool) for the claimants. |
| Michael Beloff QC (instructed by Denton Wilde Sapte) for the defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 26 August 2003 |
Catchwords
Injunction - Interim injunction - Jurisdiction - Claimants seeking relief against defendants - Existence of justiciable complaint.
The Case
On the facts of the instant case, the claimants were refused relief against the RFU and NuneatonRFC on the basis that the court was of the view that in the instant case there had been no complaint that could be justiciable under the court's jurisdiction, moreover, if the court had jurisdiction it would not have granted relief on basis of the claimants' delay and of the disruptive consequences of the relief sought.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
