| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 52 (Sep) |
| Court: | Administrative Court |
| Judge: | Scott Baker J |
| Representation | David Pannick QC and Mark Henderson (instructed by the Hackney Law Centre) for the claimants. |
| Philip Havers QC and Shaheen Rahman (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 11 September 2002 |
Catchwords
Immigration - Leave to enter - Refugee - Asylum - Deportation to responsible state - Secretary of State certifying that arguments made by asylum seekers that deportation to responsible state would be in breach of European Convention on Human Rights manifestly unfounded - Whether Secretary of State in error - s 72(2) - European Convention on Human Rights, art 8.
The Case
The court ruled, allowing the claimants' application for judicial review, that in the circumstances the Secretary of State had erred in maintaining his certification made pursuant to s72(2) of the that arguments made by the claimants that their removal to Germany would result in breaches of their Convention rights were manifestly unfounded.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

