| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 162 (Sep) |
| Court: | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Recorder Underhill QC, Mrs J Matthias and Mrs L Tinsley |
| Representation | Richard Hacker QC (instructed by Berwin Leighton Paisner) for the employers. |
| Andrew Clarke QC (instructed by Elborne Mitchell) for the employees. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 10 September 2002 |
Catchwords
Employment tribunal - Procedure - Hearing - Preliminary hearing - Appeal pending against interlocutory decision - Appeal listed after preliminary hearing - Whether preliminary hearing to be adjourned.
The Case
Where a preliminary hearing was listed before an appeal against an interlocutory decision, and the outcome of the appeal would have a substantial bearing on the preliminary hearing, it was held that in the circumstances the preliminary hearing should be adjourned until after the appeal had been heard.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
