| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 04 (Oct) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2002] EWHC 1967 (Admin) |
| Court: | Administrative Court |
| Judge: | Richards J |
| Representation | Robin Purchas QC and Jonathon Milner (instructed by Laing Homes) for the claimant. |
| David Forsdick (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the first defendant. | |
| Timothy Corner QC and John Pugh Smith (instructed by Olswangs) for the third defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 1 October 2002 |
Catchwords
Town and country planning - Permission for development - Appeal - Secretary of State granting outline permission to building company for residential development - Claimant appealing - Claimant contending grant of permission prejudicing its own application - Whether Secretary of State required to conduct comparative assessment.
The Case
It had not been incumbent on the Secretary of State to consider the comparative merits of two applications for planning permission, in circumstances where one of the applicants believed that it would be prejudiced if the other were granted permission, where he had not raised any earlier objection to the proposal.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
