| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 206 (May) |
| Court: | Administrative Court |
| Judge: | Sullivan J |
| Representation | Charles George QC (instructed by Stafford Eales) for the claimants. |
| Timothy Corner QC (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 14 May 2002 |
Catchwords
Town and country planning - Permission for development - Refusal - Claimant applying for permission to develop former hospital in green belt for residential housing - Secretary of State calling in decision - Planning inspector ruling in favour of claimant - Secretary of State accepting numerous findings of inspector but overturning decision - Whether reasoning in Secretary of State's decision letter sufficient.
The Case
A decision by the Secretary of State under s77 of the dismissing the claimants' application for planning development was quashed, on the ground that it contained insufficient reasoning.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
