| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 468 (May) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Patten J |
| Representation | Christopher Smith (instructed by DG solicitors) for the respondent. |
| The applicant appeared in person. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 29 May 2002 |
Catchwords
Injunction - Company - Compulsory winding up - Discharge of injunction restraining presentation of petition - Applicant presenting statutory demand against respondent bank - Court granting injunction restraining presentation of petition - Applicant applying for discharge of injunction - Whether injunction should be discharged - s 42.
The Case
The applicant's application for discharge of an injunction restraining him from presenting a winding up petition against the respondent bank was dismissed, on the basis that the applicant was subject to a court order pursuant to s42 of the and had not sought the necessary permission before presenting the winding-up petition.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
