| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 229 (Mar) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Pumfrey J |
| Representation | Peter Smith QC (instructed by Michael Walters, Grimsby) for the claimant. |
| John McGhee (instructed by Lovells) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 15 March 2002 |
Catchwords
Specific performance - Order - Form of order - Claim for specific performance or damages in lieu - Defendant ordered to perform minor works - Defendant claiming specific performance impossible and damages appropriate remedy - Whether order of specific performance correct.
The Case
The defendant's objection to the court's order of specific performance was dismissed as on the evidence specific performance was the appropriate remedy and the performance of the ordered works were not impossible for the defendant to complete.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
