| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 458 (Mar) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Lawrence Collins J |
| Representation | David Ewart (instructed by Hempsons) for the appellants. |
| Melanie Hall (instructed by the Solicitor for Customs & Excise) for the commissioners. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 27 March 2002 |
Catchwords
Value added tax - Exemptions - Medical care - Appellant partnership providing general medical services - Appellant providing appliances or drugs for immediate treatment of patients - Appellant providing drugs or appliances to patients having serious difficulty in obtaining them from pharmacy - Commissioners deciding services provided by doctors exempt from VAT - Tribunal upholding commissioners' findings - Whether supply of drugs zero-rated - Whether supply of drug exempt - Item 1A, Group 12, Sch 8, Item 1(a), Group 7, Sch 9 - National Health Service Regulations (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 1992, regs 19, 20 - National Health Service (General Medical Services) Regulations 1992.
The Case
The purpose of reg 20 of the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 1992, was to enable doctors to step into the shoes of pharmacists in areas where rural patients had difficulty in obtaining access to a pharmacist. In the instant case, where the doctor personally administered the drug, such a supply was not zero-rated under Item 1A of Group 8 of Sch 12 to the . Accordingly, there was no basis for interfering with the VAT tribunal's decision and the appeal would be dismissed.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

