||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 437 (Mar)
|| EWHC 481 (Admin)
||David Wolfe (instructed by Brooke North, Leeds) for the claimant.
||Katy Skerrett (instructed by Phillip Baker, East Sussex) for the defendant.
||27 March 2002
Highway - Diversion - Footpaths and bridleways - Defendant blocking footpath with large barn and other associated obstructions - Local authority proposing to take action against obstruction - Defendant proposing diversion of footpath - Authority acceding to proposal and submitting policy to Secretary of State for confirmation - Claimant objecting to diversion - Whether authority frustrating claimant's legitimate expectation.
A local authority had been entitled to submit a diversion order in respect of a footpath to the Secretary of State in circumstances where it had concluded that the removal of an obstruction on the footpath was not reasonably achievable.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary