| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 226 (Jun) |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Pill, Potter and Judge LJJ |
| Representation | Richard Harwood (instructed by Richard Buxton, Cambridge) for the applicant. |
| Reuben Taylor (instructed by Richard Lewis, Oxford) for the authority. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 27 June 2002 |
Catchwords
Town and country planning - Permission for development - Material consideration - Application for permission to develop listed building - Planning committee deferring application to seek amendments to design - Developer stating that unless original design approved only minimal maintenance to be carried out on listed building - Policy document relating to developments for which permission would not be granted on merits but would be granted because of value added to heritage asset - Planning committee approving development - Committee not considering policy document ||Whether committee having granted permission on development's own merits or on basis that it would improve listed building.
The Case
A potential applicant for judicial review in a case involving review of a local authority's decision to grant planning permission was entitled to seek information from an authority as to the procedures it had followed. An applicant could not know if he had an arguable case unless he did so, and it was undesirable to set in motion the process of litigation before an effort had been made to resolve the issue through pre-trial correspondence. However, the obligation to apply promptly remained a feature of the law and should not be ignored by applicants in the expectation that the word 'promptly' was a dead letter.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

