||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 60 (Jul)
|| EWCA Civ 951
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Kennedy, May and Tuckey LJJ
||David Pannick QC and Eleanor Grey (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
||Edward Fitzgerald QC and Philippa Kaufmann (instructed by Irwin Mitchell, Sheffield) for the claimant.
||4 July 2002
Human rights - Liberty - Detention - Lawfulness - Custodial sentence including element of prevention - Judge imposing longer sentence than commensurate with offence as offender danger to public - Whether convention rights requiring periodic review of lawfulness of detention whilst serving preventative element of sentence - s 2(2)(b) - European Convention on Human Rights, art 5(4).
A sentence imposed by a judge pursuant to his powers under s80(2)(b) of the to impose a sentence longer than it would otherwise be, because the judge was of the opinion that it was necessary to protect the public from serious harm from the offender, was a determinate sentence as it could not exceed the statutory maximum for the index offence. It did not, therefore, hand over to the executive the decision as to when the offender should be released. Moreover, the decision to impose the longer term was plainly a judicial decision every aspect of which was subject to appeal so that the supervision required by art5(4) was incorporated into the decision.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary