| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 391 (Jan) |
| Court: | Administrative Court |
| Judge: | Andrew Smith J |
| Representation | Nadine Radford QC and Peter Caldwell (instructed by Kaim Todner) for the applicant. |
| John Black QC and Jane Bewley (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the prosecution. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 17 January 2002 |
Catchwords
Criminal evidence and procedure - Trial - Preparatory hearing - Judge conducting two separate preparatory hearings in respect of different defendants charged on same indictment - Entitlement to hold separate preparatory hearings - s 29(2).
The Case
The provisions of the did not contemplate a preparatory hearing only against some of a number of defendants on an indictment. Although, it was possible that there might be questions properly determined at a preparatory hearing (as at a trial) that would affect only one defendant.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
