||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 225 (Jan)
|| EWCA Crim 18
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Kay LJ, Mackay J and The Recorder of Chester
||Richard Anelay QC and Neil Mercer (instructed by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Richard Camden Pratt QC and Gavin Argent (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||25 January 2002
Criminal law - Appeal - Fresh evidence - Admission - Whether necessary or expedient in the interests of justice to admit evidence not adduced at trial - s 23.
The court declined to admit fresh evidence on an appeal because the evidence in question had been available to the defence at the time of the trial and it had not been called for tactical reasons. It was therefore neither necessary nor expedient in the interests of justice to admit the evidence
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary