| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 29 (Dec) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Peter Smith J |
| Representation | Matthew Collings (instructed by KSB Law) for the claimants. |
| Ian Gatt QC (instructed by Fladgate Fielder) for the defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 3 December 2002 |
Catchwords
Costs - Order - Security for costs - Application of established tests - CPR 25.12, 25.13.2(b),(c).
The Case
On an application by the defendants for an order for security for costs, the court ruled that it was satisfied on the evidence that it was appropriate to make the order in respect of the first and second claimants, pursuant to CPR25.13.2(c) and CPR25.13.2(b) respectively.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
