| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 39 (Aug) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Jacob J |
| Representation | Victor Joffe QC (instructed by Peters & Peters) for the claimants. |
| The defendants did not appear and were not represented. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 9 August 2002 |
Catchwords
Practice - Service out of the jurisdiction - Pre-trial or post-judgment relief - Action for damages for conspiracy - Application for interim payment - Whether application validly served on defendants - Whether court satisfied claimant obtaining judgment for substantial amount of money against defendant at trial - CPR 25.7.
The Case
On an application for an interim payment in proceedings by which the claimants sought damages for conspiracy, the court was satisfied on the evidence that, if the case went to trial, the claimant would obtain judgment for a substantial amount of money against the defendant from whom he sought the order for an interim payment pursuant to CPR25.7(1)(c) and accordingly allowed the application.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
