||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 229 (Apr)
||Marc Willers (instructed by Battens, Yeovil) for the claimant.
||Timothy Corner QC (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the respondents.
||25 April 2002
Town and country planning - Permission for development - Refusal - Planning inspector concluding boarded out loft not counting as 'floorspace' for purpose of local planning policies - Whether inspector in error.
The question of whether a roof area was 'floorspace' for the purposes of local planning policies, which restricted residential development that extended the floorspace of dwellings by more than 30%, was one of fact and degree, having regard to all the circumstances, including access to the area and headroom.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary