| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2001] All ER (D) 70 (Sep) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Neuberger J |
| Judgment Dates: | 25 September 2001 |
Catchwords
Practice - Consent order - Variation - Application to vary consent order - Claimant having given undertaking not to act to reduce equity in matrimonial home - Anticipated value of equity having been diminished - Claimant seeking to vary undertaking - Whether material change in respondent's circumstances.
The Case
On an application to vary an undertaking given by the first respondent not to reduce his equity in the proceeds of sale of his property, the court ruled that, on the evidence, the first respondent had failed to establish that he had no other assets with which to pay his legal expenses and, accordingly, the application would be dismissed.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
