A
- A v B (a company) and another
- Abouchitaa v El-Yamlahi
- Aikman v Stubbs
- Air India Ltd v Caribjet Inc
- Amor v Galliard Homes
- Applied Computer Expertise Ltd v Parallellweb Ltd
- Attorney General's Reference (No 72 of 2001)
- Attorney-General v Ebert
B
- Bacardi GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bremerhaven (Case C-253/99)
- Barlow v Southwark London Borough Council
- Bennett (t/a Foxbar Hotel) v Reid
- Bensusan v Freedman
- Blueprint Books Ltd and another v Tanner
- Boughton and another v Audio Group International Ltd
- Bradford Hospitals NHS Trust v Burcher
- Bradford Metropolitan District Council v Yorkshire Water Services Ltd
- Bruce Anchor (Scotland) Ltd v Turbert
C
- Ceredigion County Council v National Assembly for Wales and another
- Cerinus v Bell College of Technology
- Chaffer v Southern Birmingham Community Health NHS Trust
- Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary v Chew
- Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police v Liversidge
- Club Airlock/Planet Studios v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and another
- Courage Ltd v Crehan (Case C-453/99)
- Credit Suisse (Monaco) SA v Attar and another
D
- D Watt (Shetland) Ltd v Reid
- Donnelley v Chief Constable of Lincolnshire and others
- Donnelly and others v Charnos plc
- Durabella Ltd v J Jarvis & Sons Ltd
E
F
- F & J Arpino v Enti
- F v Lambeth London Borough Council
- Flexible Ducting Ltd v Stirling
- Forcer v Bakers Food & Allied Workers Union
- Franks and others v Torrington Co Ltd
- Fuller v Mastercare Service & Distribution
G
- Gosain v Gosain
- Graham v The Chief Constable of the Bedfordshire Constabulary
- Grzelczyk v Centre Public d'Aide Sociale d'Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve (Case C-184/99)
- Gunn and another v AMF Aviation Enterprises Ltd and another
H
- Hans Schwarzkopf GmbH & Co KG v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV (Case C-169/99)
- Hewlett Packard Ltd v O'Murphy
- Hi Fashion Music Co-op v James
- Hubbard and others v Lambeth Southwark and Lewisham Health Authority and others
I
- IFR Ltd v Federal Trade Spa
- Institute of Independent Insurance Brokers v Director General of Fair Trading and joined appeals
- Inverclyde Council v Wilson and others
J
- JH Smith (Hale) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and another
- John Dickie Homes Ltd v Jones
K
L
- London Clubs Management Ltd v Hood
- Lowe v Everest Ltd and others
- LUK Leamington Ltd v Whitnash plc and another
- Lutak v William West & Son (Ilkeston) Ltd
M
- Maidstone Borough Council v Tebbutt
- Mansard Country Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and another
- Martin v Michael Conn Goldsobel
- McColl v Sabacchi (Listing Officer)
- Meakin v Liverpool City Council Leisure Services Directorate
- Medway Council v BBC
- Métropole Télévision (M6) and others v European Commission, supported by CanalSatellite (Case T-112/99)
- Morrow v Safeway Stores plc
N
P
- Papamichael v National Westminster Bank plc
- Partco Group Ltd and another v Wragg and another
- Perth and Kinross Council v Howard
- Pitney Bowes Ltd and another v Renshaw Birch Ltd and others
- Pretty v Gardiner and another
- Prosser v Wallace McDowall Ltd
R
- R (on the application of Ashton) v Bolton Combined Court
- R (on the application of Banks) v Governor of Wakefield Prison and another
- R (on the application of Banks) v The Governor of HMP Wakefield and another
- R (on the application of Barkoci and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-257/99)
- R (on the application of Bateman and another) v Legal Services Commission
- R (on the application of Boucenna) v Special Adjudicator
- R (on the application of Collins) v Lincolnshire Health Authority
- R (on the application of Cowl and others) v Plymouth City Council
- R (on the application of Gashi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another
- R (on the application of Hayes) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Kondova) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-235/99)
- R (on the application of L and others) v Manchester City Council
- R (on the application of Poulton) v Common Council of Corporation of London
- R (on the application of S) v City of Plymouth
- R (on the application of Saadi and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Stewart) v London Borough of Wandsworth and others
- R (on the application of the National Association of Guardians Ad Litem and others) v Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service
- R (on the application of Wilson) v West Berkshire District Council
- R (on the application of Yogathas and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R v A and others
- R v Allison
- R v Austin
- R v Austin
- R v Bannerman
- R v Briggs
- R v Camilleri
- R v Cathra
- R v Chapman
- R v Devaney
- R v Dixon
- R v Foster
- R v H and others
- R v Harrington
- R v Holland
- R v Horrigan and another
- R v Immigration Officer, Stansted Airport, ex parte Khunsanong and another
- R v James
- R v James
- R v L
- R v M
- R v Metcalf
- R v Ogunsulire
- R v Ogunsulsire
- R v S
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Gloszczuk and another (Case C-63/99)
- R v Shayler
- R v Smith
- R v T
- R v Warsane
- R v Webb
- R v Woodward
- Re Arch (tariff recommendations)
- Re Cheema (tariff recommendations)
- Re H (a child) (Adoption: Parental consent)
- Re M (a child: interim residence order)
- Re SS (An Adult: Medical treatment)
- Re Trading Partners Ltd
- Re Warr (recommendations as to tariff)
- Re Whirlpool Europe BV
- Reynolds v The Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and the Regions and another
- Ryan and another v Liverpool Health Authority
- Ryan v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions
S
- Saed v Ealing NHS Trust
- Sam v Guy's & St Thomas's Hospital Trust
- Sarwar v Alam
- Schieving-Nijstad vof and others v Groeneveld (Case C-89/99)
- Scottish & Southern Energy plc v Birch
- Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Davies and others
- Smith v Hewitson and another (t/a Executive Coach Catering Services)
- South v Chamberlayne and others
- Surrey County Council v York
- Sutton v HMG Holdings Ltd
- Swayfields Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and others
T
- Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council v Grant
- Thompson v SCS Consulting Ltd and others
- Titchener and others v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Trafigura Beheer BV v BCL Trading GmbH
