||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 446 (Oct)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Henry LJ, Goldring and Tomlinson JJ
||Charles Pugh (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Alan Suckling and Mukul Chawla (instructed by the Customs and Excise) for the prosecution.
||31 October 2001
Criminal law - Indictment - Particulars - Accuracy - Judge refusing application to quash indictment for defective particulars - Whether conviction safe - s 72.
The defendant's conviction for offences of fraudulent evasion of value added tax contrary to s72 of the was safe because his indictment was not defective in law.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary