| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2001] All ER (D) 446 (Oct) |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Henry LJ, Goldring and Tomlinson JJ |
| Representation | Charles Pugh (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant. |
| Alan Suckling and Mukul Chawla (instructed by the Customs and Excise) for the prosecution. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 31 October 2001 |
Catchwords
Criminal law - Indictment - Particulars - Accuracy - Judge refusing application to quash indictment for defective particulars - Whether conviction safe - s 72.
The Case
The defendant's conviction for offences of fraudulent evasion of value added tax contrary to s72 of the was safe because his indictment was not defective in law.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
