||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 354 (Oct)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Holman and Grigson JJ
||Ravinder Dogra, solicitor advocate (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||25 October 2001
Sentencing - Conspiracy to steal - Young offenders - Custodial sentence - Disparity with co-defendant's sentence - Whether sentence manifestly excessive.
The defendant's sentence of nine months' detention in a young offender institution for an offence of conspiracy to steal was manifestly excessive because it was disparate to his co-defendant's non-custodial sentence for the same offence.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary