| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2001] All ER (D) 354 (Oct) |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Holman and Grigson JJ |
| Representation | Ravinder Dogra, solicitor advocate (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant. |
| Judgment Dates: | 25 October 2001 |
Catchwords
Sentencing - Conspiracy to steal - Young offenders - Custodial sentence - Disparity with co-defendant's sentence - Whether sentence manifestly excessive.
The Case
The defendant's sentence of nine months' detention in a young offender institution for an offence of conspiracy to steal was manifestly excessive because it was disparate to his co-defendant's non-custodial sentence for the same offence.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
