Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2001] All ER (D) 164 (Oct)
Court: Court of Justice of the European Communities (Second Chamber)
Judge:

Judges Colneric (President of the Chamber), Skouris (Rapporteur) and Cunha Rodrigues

Judgment Dates: 11 October 2001

Catchwords

European Community - Value added tax - Rate - Luxembourg property agent - Managing agent of buildings in co-ownership - Concept of 'liberal profession' - Whether liberal professions including activity such as that of managing agent of buildings in co-ownership - Council Directive (EEC) 77/388, Annex F(2).

The Case

It was for each member state to determine and define the transactions to which could be applied a reduced rate of value added tax (VAT) under art12(4) of Council Directive (EEC) 77-388 (on the harmonisation of the laws of the member states relating to turnover taxescommon system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment), until 31 December 1992, and under art28(2)(e) of that directive as amended by Council Directive (EEC) 92-77, as from 1 January 1993, subject to the necessity to respect the principle of neutrality of the VAT. The liberal professions mentioned in Annex F(2) to the Sixth Directive were activities which involved a marked intellectual character, required a high-level qualification and were usually subject to clear and strict professional regulation. In the exercise of such an activity, the personal element was of special importance and such exercise always involved a large measure of independence in the accomplishment of the professional activities.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.