| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 38 (Feb) |
| Court: | Emloyment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Judge A Wilkie QC, Mr J R Crosby and Mr H Singh |
| Representation | Peter Ward (instructed by Keoghs, Bolton) for the appellant. |
| John Hand QC (instructed by Chandler Harris, Manchester) for the respondent. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 16 November 2001 |
Catchwords
Employment - Disability - Discrimination - Mental illness - Tribunal determining appellant not suffering from continuing depression - Whether tribunal in error.
The Case
The decision of the majority of the employment tribunal that the appellant was not disabled because she was not suffering from a relevant mental impairment at the relevant time, was one which could not be faulted, either in terms of its legal analysis or in terms of the evidence supporting it.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
