| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2001] All ER (D) 02 (Jul) |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss P and Thorpe LJ |
| Representation | Christopher Felstead (instructed by Johnson Partnership, Nottingham) for the husband. |
| Judgment Dates: | 2 July 2001 |
Catchwords
Contempt - Committal - Order - Effect of procedural defects - Husband subject of non-molestation and exclusion order - Husband breaching injunction - Committal order containing procedural defects - Whether committal order to be set aside.
The Case
On the facts of the instant case, the procedural defects in a committal order had not caused any prejudice or injustice to the contemnor and the court would not set aside the committal order.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
