| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2001] All ER (D) 140 (Jul) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2001] UKHL 38 |
| Court: | House of Lords |
| Judge: | Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Hope of Craighead and Lord Millett |
| Representation | Geoffrey Hobbs (instructed by Herbert Smith) for NLA. |
| Michael Silverleaf QC and Mark Vanhegan (instructed by Robert Ivens) for M&S. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 12 July 2001 |
Catchwords
Copyright - Infringement - Typographical arrangement - Newspaper - Whether copyright in typographical arrangement of newspaper in whole newspaper or in individual articles - Whether copying amounting to copying of substantial part - ,,.
The Case
On the true construction of of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, the term 'typographical arrangement of published editions' in s 1(1)(c) referred to the typographical arrangement of a whole newspaper, not the typographical arrangement of each article published in the newspaper.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
