| Publisher Citation: | [2001] All ER (D) 106 (Jan) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Laddie J |
| Representation | Christopher Nugee QC (instructed by Lovell White Durrant) for the claimants. |
| Launcelot Henderson QC (instructed by the Solicitor to British Telecommunications) for the first defendant. | |
| Jules Sher QC and Sarah Asplin (instructed by Russell Jones & Walker) for the second and third defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 19 January 2001 |
Catchwords
Pension - Pension scheme - Company pension scheme - Construction of scheme - Ancillary matters - Whether interest should be compounded or not.
The Case
The normal rule, even in equity, was that the courts should award simple interest. The factor which determined whether compound interest could be awarded was the existence of fraud or impropriety on behalf of the trustees.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
