||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 320 (Feb)
||Queen's Bench Division
||Augustus Ulstein QC (instructed by Alexander Harris) for the claimant.
||Michael Spencer QC and Prashant Popat (instructed by Davies Arnold Cooper) for Smithkline Beecham Plc.
||26 February 2001
Limitation of Action - Period of limitation - Claim for damages - Claimant bringing action against pharmaceutical company - Claimant's solicitors mistakenly bringing action against wrong company - Claimant seeking order to substitute correct defendant - Defendant contending claimant making application out of time - Whether claimant's action brought out of time - ss 11A(3), 11A(4), 35, - CPR 19.5 - .
Where a party sought to substitute a defendant during existing proceedings because he was out of time for bringing fresh proceedings in respect of the correct defendant, under the it was too simple an approach to say that once the had operated to extinguish a right of action, there could be no right to pursue it, despite an express provision made by Parliament elsewhere in the same Act.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary