||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 166 (Feb)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Aldous, Chadwick and Laws LJJ
||Paul Holmes (instructed by Fruhman Davies Livingstones, Manchester) for the claimant.
||David Berkeley QC (instructed by Hibbert Durrad Davies, Nantwich) for the defendant.
||14 February 2001
Practice - Summary judgment - Action for recovery of debt - Judge finding defendant having no prospect of defending claim - Judge granting summary judgment in favour of claimant - Defendant making application to adduce fresh evidence - Whether compelling reason for matter to go to trial.
In the light of the fresh evidence which had become available, the district judge was plainly and obviously wrong that judgment could be given on a summary basis without trial. The new evidence had shown that the dispute went wider and a trial was therefore necessary. However, the judge had correctly refused the defendant's application to have the order granting summary judgment set aside as in the light of the pending appeal, he did not have the jurisdiction to accede to that application.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary