| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2001] All ER (D) 256 (Dec) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Stanley Burnton J |
| Representation | Robert Miles and Gregory Denton-Cox (instructed by Peters & Peters) for the claimant. |
| Catherine Roberts (instructed by Lawrence Graham) for the defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 17 December 2001 |
Catchwords
Company - Director - Duty - Fiduciary duty - Freezing injunction - Application to continue freezing injunction - Whether claimant having arguable claim against director for amount exceeding sums protected under freezing injunction.
The Case
On an application to continue a freezing injunction in proceedings brought against a company director for breach of his fiduciary duties, the court ruled on the evidence, the claimant had established a good arguable claim against the defendants which exceeded the sums protected by the freezing injunction and accordingly continued the injunction.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
