| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2001] All ER (D) 69 (Apr) |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Ward, Sedley and Jonathan Parker LJJ |
| Representation | The respondent appeared in person. |
| Michael Dineen (instructed by Blatch & Co) for the appellant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 6 April 2001 |
Catchwords
Costs - Order for costs - Discretion ||Disallowing costs of successful party - Matters to be taken into account - Court taking into account conduct before as well as during proceedings - CPR 44.3.
The Case
Notwithstanding that the appellant had succeeded in its appeal, the demands of justice, in accordance with the overriding objective of the CPR, required that no order for costs of the appeal should be made.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
