Lukoil-Kaliningredmorneft plc v Tata Ltd and another

Source:	All England Reporter
Publisher Citation:	[1999] All ER (D) 413
Court:	Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Judge:	Morritt, May and Tuckey LJJ
Representation	Nigel Teare QC and Nigel Jacobs (instructed by Penningtons) for Tata.
	Simon Crookenden QC and Karen Troy-Davies (instructed by Brooks & Co) for Lukoil.
Judgment Dates:	23 April 1999

Catchwords

Agent - Contract - Towage contract - Actual or ostensible authority - Whether towage contract made with actual or ostensible authority of first defendant.

The Case

Practice Areas

Company Commercial

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.

Lexis^®Library

The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

This case summary is from Lexis®Library

For the digest and full transcript of this case, request a Lexis®Library Free Trial

"The Legal Library on LexisNexis Butterworths has freed up people’s time because it is instantaneous.

Our lock up - the period of time from the customer walking through the
door to billing - has improved.

That is our measure of profitability."

Helen Thompson, Head of Dispute Resolution - SAS Daniels

LexisCheck

Use our traffic light system to ensure your legal references are accurate.

Find out more about Lexis^®Check.