Whitechurch v Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain

Source:	All England Reporter
Publisher Citation:	[1997] All ER (D) 78
Court:	Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Judge:	Schiemann LJ and Mitchell J
Representation	Andrew Baker (instructed by Raison & Co, Handsworth) for the appellant.
	David Bradly (instructed by Walker Martineau) for the respondent.
Judgment Dates:	18 November 1997

Catchwords

Insurance - Pharmacist - Disciplinary proceedings for misconduct - Respondent's Code of Ethics requiring professional indemnity insurance - Appellant not in possession of professional indemnity insurance - Appellant having business policy - Whether business policy providing sufficient indemnity.

The Case

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.

Lexis^®Library

The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary

This case summary is from Lexis®Library

For the digest and full transcript of this case, request a Lexis®Library Free Trial

"The Legal Library on LexisNexis Butterworths has freed up people’s time because it is instantaneous.

Our lock up - the period of time from the customer walking through the
door to billing - has improved.

That is our measure of profitability."

Helen Thompson, Head of Dispute Resolution - SAS Daniels

LexisCheck

Use our traffic light system to ensure your legal references are accurate.

Find out more about Lexis^®Check.