Julian M. Potter#3623

Julian M. Potter

Year Qualified: UK: 1994; EPO: 1995 A Patent and European Trade Mark Attorney and Intellectual Property litigator, Julian's practice encompasses all physics based disciplines, including: telecommunications; antenna design; semiconductors; optics; control systems; software; cryptography; mechanical engineering; nanotechnology; medical devices; nuclear physics, imaging; electronics and microprocessors; voice recognition, text-to-speech conversion and oil services technology. He has wide experience of drafting and prosecuting patent applications for the UK Intellectual Property Office and European Patent Office, and before patent offices throughout the world. Julian represents clients in contentious matters including oppositions and appeals before the Patent Offices and UK Courts; and in infringement and validity opinions, freedom to operate opinions, due diligence investigations, IP strategy, and product clearances. Julian holds a Higher Courts Litigation Certificate entitling him to conduct IP litigation in the courts. He has been involved in both Patents Court and Patents County Court (now the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court) litigation covering a wide range of technologies ranging from cryptographic key exchange architecture (Irdeto v Telewest), design methods for oil exploration drill bits (Halliburton v Smith), GPS applications (GPS Industries v Prolink), automotive manufacturing (Kuka & Thompson Friction Welding v Michael Dorsett & Magna International Inc) and biodegradeable films (Innovia Films Ltd v Fritolay North America, Inc.). While an in-house patent manager Julian gained wide experience of the commercial and strategic value of intellectual property on a global scale and regularly applies that experience to advising clients on the development, exploitation and enforcement of a global intellectual property portfolio.
Contributed to

1

US, EPO and UK approaches to patenting software
US, EPO and UK approaches to patenting software
Practice notes

This Practice Note introduces how software or computer programs can be patented in the UK and other commercially important regimes of the European Patent Office (EPO) and USA. In all of these jurisdictions, various tests have been developed to assist in deciding where the boundaries of the statutory rules lie, since in general terms it is only ‘pure’ software inventions (absent any other advantage) that are unpatentable. It also discusses the High Court’s decision in Emotional Perception AI v Comptroller-General of Patents which makes it easier to patent AI in the UK.

Practice Area

Panel

  • Contributing Author

Qualified Year

  • 1994

Membership

  • Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys
  • European Patent Institute (European Patent Attorney)
  • INTA
  • AIPPI
  • FICPI
  • Chartered Physicist
  • Member of the Institute of Physics
  • Member of the Institute of Technology

Education

  • 2008: LLM in Intellectual Property Litigation, Nottingham Trent University
  • 1990: PhD in Physics for thesis entitled "Study of a Quasi-Optical Power Combiner", Royal Holloway &
  • 1986: BSc in Physics with Microcomputing, Royal Holloway & Bedford New College

If you expected to see yourself on this page, click here.